International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Lodge 290
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 910149663
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Bremerton, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3603775391
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $168,525
- Expenses
- $102,214
- Assets
- $144,453
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mark Leighton (President)
- Rachel Montoy (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Pamela Sabo (Sgt. of Arms)
- Deanna Cain (Secretary-Treas)
- Mark Leighton (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of international brotherhood of boilermakers lodge 290 is to act as a bargaining agent for shipfitters, riggers, welders and deck hands employed at puget sound naval shipyard, bangor and keyport military installations. This union also represents federal employees of coast guard stationed in seattle. Additionally, lodge 290 advocates and represents individual employees in labor related matters.
What it reported doing in 2025
International brotherhood of boilermakers lodge 290 acts as a bargaining agent for shipfitters, riggers, welders and deck hands employed at puget sound naval shipyard, bangor and keyport military installations. This union also represents federal employees of coast guard stationed in seattle. Additionally, lodge 290 advocates and represents individual employees in labor related matters.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 49% for direct work, 51% for grants, and 0% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.7%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.3%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $102K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.