International Brotherhood of 891 Tcwh

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
640151624
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Pearl, MS, USA
Phone
6013728322
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,223,570
Expenses
$1,817,648
Assets
$3,839,374
Liabilities
$79,680

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES L PINKARD (PRESIDENT)
  • CARL A JONES (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • CURTIS HAYNES (SECRETARY TREASURER): $191,784 total reported compensation
  • JAMES L PINKARD (PRESIDENT): $190,281 total reported compensation
  • SHERRY SHACK (RECORDING SECRETARY): $7,451 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The objectives of this international union are to organize under one banner all workers engaged in industry; to educate them to cooperate in every movement which tends to benefit the union; and to impress upon membership, employers, and the public that it is to the advantage of all concerned that workers be organized. The organization of industry requires honest and intelligent membership, adapted to the business. The union teaches their membership the advantage, benefits, and importance of their industrial position, and the union endeavors to build-up and perfect a labor organization in conformity with the highest standards of american and canadian citizenship. The union seeks to ensure that the contributions made by members to improve industries are recognized and that workers receive the benefits derived from their labors in the form of reasonable hours, fair wages, improved working conditions, and respectful treatment by their employers.

What it reported doing in 2025

Teamsters stand ready to organize workers who want to bargain collectively. For 2025, there were 2,179 active members. Several members were lost who took advantage of a ups driver retirement buyout. The union negotiated labor contracts between employees and management. In 2025, new contracts were negotiated and put into effect for mondelez and first student. Contract extensions were signed for durham bus services and harrah's casino. Yrc's bankruptcy negotiations are ongoing. The organization is keeping ex-employees up to date as they learn of any new developments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 43
  • Accountability: 55
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.1%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $192K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 12 of 13 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.