International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

12 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Labor Union

Representation of Union Members

Revenue model: Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 58.3%; rating input score 58; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 28.6%; rating input score 29; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 15.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 2 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $282K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $269K reported
Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 29/100.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 58/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.