International Brotherhood of 26 Neca Labor Mngmt Coop Comm Tr Fu
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 526839884
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lanham, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3017311062
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,325,132
- Expenses
- $1,780,859
- Assets
- $2,973,683
- Liabilities
- $71,916
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- JOSEPH DABBS (TRUSTEE)
- RICK STEELE (TRUSTEE)
- TOM CLARK (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is engaged in education and information programs designated to improve communications between representatives of labor and management for a local union of electrical workers.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization engaged in education and information programs, including production of videos, designed to improve communications between representatives of labor and management; to provide workers and employers with opportunities to study and explore new and innovative joint approaches to achieving organizational effectiveness; to assist workers and employers in solving problems of mutual concern not susceptible to resolution within the collective bargaining process; to study and explore ways of eliminating potential problems which reduce the competitiveness and inhibit the economic development of the electrical construction industry; to sponsor programs which improve job security, enhance economic and community development, and promote the general welfare of the community and the industry; to engage in research and development programs concerning various aspects of the industry, including, but not limited to, new technologies, occupational safety and health, labor relations, and new methods of improved production; to engage in public education and other programs to expand the economic development of the electrical construction industry; to enhance the involvement of workers in making decisions that affect their working lives; and to do any and all other lawful activities incidental or related to the accomplishment of these purposes and goals. The organization promoted the benefits of the union electrical industry through various media outlets; promoted the electrical industry as a career to students; and promoted safety at worksites.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 90.4%; rating input score 90; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.4%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.67; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 30.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $880K reported
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.