International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 950514075
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Wilmington, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3108356688
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $836,074
- Expenses
- $431,736
- Assets
- $3,279,330
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RUDOLPH MORALES (PRESIDENT)
- JAVIER CONTRERAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- RUDOLPH MORALES (PRESIDENT): $6,599 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL DI GAETANO (TRUSTEE): $2,557 total reported compensation
- JAVIER CONTRERAS (VICE PRESIDENT): $2,272 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
For the betterment of wages hours and working conditions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.4%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.6; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $500K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $7K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.