International Association of Lions Northside

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
636054553
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Samantha, AL, USA
Phone
2053307805
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,702
Expenses
$10,571
Assets
$25,241

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELDEN WILLNGHAM (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RICK CRITES (VICE PRESIDE)
  • ELDEN WILLNGHAM (PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA MCCARLEY (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To help local needy with sight problems, diabetes, and disasters such as house fires, bad wrecks, etc.

What it reported doing in 2021

Support state and local charities such as Alabama lions sight, lcif campaign sight ii, camp seale harris, leader dog for the blind, eldridge baptist and tucaloosa umc childern's home christmas gifts, paid for 2 local persons eye exams and glasses, gave support to a young child to diabetes camp and made local donations in memory of deceased members to food pantry and a cemetary fund.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.5%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 97.3%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.7%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.39; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.5% of revenue deployed · 97.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.