International Association of Lions Clubs New Braunfels Breakfast
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510199753
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- New Braunfels, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8306096686
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,994
- Expenses
- $10,420
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Frank Altschuler (President)
- Marc Rogers (Vice President)
- Lynn Caddell (Vice President)
- Paul Leming (Vice President)
- Vol Forrest McGlothlin (Past President)
People named in this filing
- Frank Altschuler (President)
- Marc Rogers (Vice President)
- Lynn Caddell (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Actively work in service to the blind and visually impaired. Follow the motto "We Serve". Support Lion charities including the Sight First Program and Texas Lions Camp.
What it reported doing in 2019
Supported Lions International charities to fight preventable blindness. These included: Texas Lions Camp; Lone Star Eye Bank; Leader Dog; Lions World Service for Blind; and other programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31.8%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 21.4%; rating input score 21
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -49%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.8% of revenue deployed · 21.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2011 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.