International Association of Lions Clubs

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
366118401
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
PawPaw, IL, USA
Phone
8157137145
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$87,695
Expenses
$43,479
Assets
$239,468
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jared Nicholson (President)
  • Paul Shaddick (1st Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Jared Nicholson (President)
  • Paul Shaddick (1st Vice-President)
  • Shawna Kerwin (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Youth Organizations are supported by our organization. We provide youth with the opportunities to participate in sports and we provide coaches, uniforms, officials, pay league fees. We award scholarships to deserving high school seniors to further their education. We support with donations the local food pantry, local fire departments, and other community service organizations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Youth activities for baseball, soccer, softball, basketball. We provide financial assistance to boys and girls to participate in these sports. We provide equipment, coaches, umpires and referees, uniforms, and etc. We provide opportunities for over 70 youth in the community to be able to participate in these activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 73% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.51; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 50% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.