International Association of Lions Clubs 2121 Half Moon Bay

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942922805
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Half Moon Bay, CA, USA
Phone
6503999470
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,196
Expenses
$36,237
Assets
$41,187

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WAYNE CHARKINS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WAYNE CHARKINS (PRESIDENT)
  • ARIA LIAGHAT (1ST VICE PRE)
  • BOB MYERS (2ND VICE PRE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To empower volunteers to serve their communities, meet humanitarian needs, encourage peace and promote international understanding through lions clubs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Direct cash contributions and support for a number of targeted charitable organizations within coastal community. Fundraisers: september poker night 4th of july pancake breakfast october pumpkin festival service projects: unloading food for st. Vincent de paul eye screenings at all coastside schools student speaker contest abundant grace coastside backpack project monthly cleaning of waves softball fields donations: eye exams & glasses canine companions for independence ear of the lion foundation lions eye foundation hmb litlle league coastside hope hmbhs grad night hmbhs cross country team hmbhs girls basketball team hmbhs high school tennis team police & fire (peninsula council) hmbhs scholarships student speaker foundation eagle scout project puente abundant grace san mateo sheriff's star camp alas coastside backpack project girls softball st vincent de paul food bank square peg

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 57% for direct work, and 43% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.1%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 96.2%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.8%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 28.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.1% of revenue deployed · 96.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.