International Association of Lions Club District 2-S3

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237151924
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Wimberley, TX, USA
Phone
5123798305
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,909
Expenses
$58,927
Assets
$105,129
Liabilities
$693

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JEFF KUNKEL (DISTRICT GOV)
  • DENNIS GUTIERREZ (1ST VICE DIS)
  • DIANE SCHAULE (2ND VICE DIS)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To coordinate and train lions in leadership positions in other clubs throughout the district. To provide grants to the Texas lions camp for disabled children in kerrville, tx, lone star eye bank, leader dog program, lions world services for the blind, Texas lions foundation, lcif, Texas lions eyeglass recycling center. To fund dues to the state lions so that programs and grants will continue.

What it reported doing in 2024

Texas lions, to provide funding to ensure the continuation of lions club throughout the state. Includes lcif, tx lions ftd, leader dog, disaster relief, lions charities, youth opportunities, world services for the blind, Texas lions eyeglass recycling.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.78; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.4% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.