International Association of Child Devel Opment Programs Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851580938
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Millsboro, DE, USA
Phone
2088693656
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$54,715
Expenses
$34,189
Assets
$29,270

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Franklin Sahlein (President)

People named in this filing

  • Franklin Sahlein (President)
  • Lori Galimore (Director)
  • Randy Sikora (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The IACDP is about enhancing the Children's Development Industry by harnessing the collective of the industry (associations, suppliers, child development centers) - Internationally and Interdisciplinary - through facilitated communication. We build a Standard of Excellence one intentional conversation, project, and conference at a time.

What it reported doing in 2023

Our program service accomplishments included (1) expanding our working Board of Directors and Committees, (2) producing 3 Video eJournals, (3) conducting our first conference, and (4) setting a Road Map for future development projects.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.5%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.5%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 92.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 108% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.