International Association for Volunteer Effort
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237049868
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2029641133
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $565,885
- Expenses
- $645,037
- Assets
- $223,198
- Liabilities
- $35,367
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Nichole Cirillo (Executive Dir.): $135,960 total reported compensation
- Kenn Allen dba CSCG (Asst Secy/Treas): $14,400 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Iave's mission is to enable leaders of volunteering worldwide to stand in solidaritywith one another, to promote, support and celebrate volunteering in all of the manyways it happens throughout the world. Iave convenes the biennial world volunteerconference and regional conferences, conducts research on global issues related tovolunteering, convences networks of global corporations and national leadership organizations for volunteering and provides publications and information services toits members. Iave creates a more just and suitable world by enabling the leaders, organizations, and environments that empower volunteers.
What it reported doing in 2024
Network DevelopmentIAVEs mission statement accurately describes our long-term goal and our primary strategy for achieving it: IAVE creates a more just and sustainable world by enabling the leaders, organizations, and environments that empower volunteers.IAVE is the largest global network of leaders of volunteering. Our member network includes individual volunteers, government agencies, multi-national agencies and institutions, academics, NGOs and businesses. IAVEs Global Corporate Volunteer Council (GCVC) is the only leadership network for global companies committed to supporting the engagement of their employees as volunteers in their communities. Our Global Network for Volunteering Leadership (GNVL) is a peer-to-peer network that allows volunteering organizations around the world to learn from one another and to forge global partnerships. IAVEs work falls into four major categories: convening, advocacy, thought leadership and leadership development.In 2023, we: Convened a roundtable on youth volunteering in London, England to focus on the interrelationship of volunteering, employability, and sustainable livelihoods; Convened 18 members of the Global Corporate Volunteer Council in Lisbon, Portugal to discuss topics such as employee development through volunteering, climate action through volunteering, self-volunteering, and volunteering in times of war. Concurrently 15 members of the Global Network for Volunteering Leadership met to discuss techniques of impact assessment of volunteering. The two groups then met together on the second day for a forum on volunteering in humanitarian crises.Members of GCVC established working groups to learn from one another through focused conversations on cross-company collaboration, disaster response, impact and innovation.IAVE supported peer organizations through participation on the programs of their conferences in Ireland, Kenya, Malaysia, South Africa, Korea and the U.S.IAVE partnered with the African Union to bring together experts from Africa, Europe, Latin America, and Asia to explore the potential of South to South collaboration. More than 180 leaders for volunteering attended the live webinar.IAVE organized online master classes for members of GNVL from throughout the world on corporate volunteering, the role of branding in the volunteer sector, and harnessing technology and reducing research inequality in the Global South.The second part of IAVEs research on the state of health of corporate volunteering throughout the world was published in 2023. The study drew on interviews with staff of 80 companies with operations in 175 countries and a combined workforce of over 8 million people. Part 2 explores regional issues in greater depth with essays written by members of the research team local to the region.In 2023, work was begun on research and thought leadership on the relationship of volunteering by youth to employability, well-bring, activism, and sustainable livelihoods. Each paper was paired with a webinar to stimulate discussion and collaborative thinking around each facet of the research. As a solid outcome from this work, in December 2023, IAVE announced a collaboration with the African Union on volunteer-powered pathways to youth employment, the Reskilling Revolution Africa.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - Most voting board members are independent and revenue has grown recently. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 52
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.3%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 52.9%; rating input score 53
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.3% of revenue deployed · 52.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $341K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $136K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.