International Association for Pattern Recognition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222264215
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Cedar Knolls, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9736052777
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $55,981
- Expenses
- $57,620
- Assets
- $563,285
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
68 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ARJAN KUIJPER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ARJAN KUIJPER (PRESIDENT)
- LALE AKARUN (1ST VICE PRE)
- CHENG-LIN LIU (2ND VICE PRE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is an international association of nonprofit, scientific and professional organizations (being national, multinational or international in scope) concerned with pattern recognition, computer vision, and image processing in a broad sense.
What it reported doing in 2023
The organization conducts a biennial international conference on pattern recognition which attracts scientists, researchers and practitioners in the field from various countries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 59% for direct work, and 41% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent and program spending has grown recently. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 54
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 74.6%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 28.1%; rating input score 28; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.78; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62% of revenue deployed · 74.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 68 of 68 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 68 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.