International Association for Court Administration
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472600565
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- Williamsburg, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7572591841
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $124,430
- Expenses
- $58,279
- Assets
- $203,433
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- THOMAS BRUTON (CEO)
- TIM BUNJEVAC (PRESIDENT EL)
- PAMELA HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- NAIL AKHMETZAKIROV (BOARD MEMBER)
- HON MARCELO LOPEZ ALFONSIN (BOARD MEMBER)
- AMEL ARFAOURI (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The international association of court administration's (iaca) mission is to promote professional court administration and management in emerging democracies and other countries pursuing the rule of law; to sponsor international conferences, forums, education and training programs on court administration and management; to serve as a resource for judges, court administrators, managers and other government officials insearch of ways in which to evaluate and improve court and justice systems.
What it reported doing in 2024
The 2024 annual conference was held in singapore on november 11-14, 2024. Approximately 200 members attended.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 53.2%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.49; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.