International Assoc of Fire Fighter Englewood Fire Fighters Local 1736
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510226964
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3032987850
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fire Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,439
- Expenses
- $14,491
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK BURLEY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARK BURLEY (PRESIDENT)
- BRYAN CASH (SECRETARY TR)
- JASON HEHN (VICE-PRES)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The objectives and aims of the union are the development of a higher degree of skill and efficiency, the maintenance of discipline, careful observance of the rules and regulations of the fire department, cultivation of a closer degree of friendship and fellowship among its members in order to secure for the membership the intellectual, social, and economic privileges that are due to all persons, and to obtain proper remuneration for services rendered.
What it reported doing in 2015
The exempt purpose of the union was achieved by holding various social functions for the members, and providing assistance to its members in the negotiation of wages, benefits, policies, conduct and advancement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.5%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -19.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.