International Assn of Firefighters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 736109378
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Tulsa, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9185998176
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $855,413
- Expenses
- $691,711
- Assets
- $1,345,288
- Liabilities
- $9,993
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATTHEW LAY (President)
- CRAIG DEERINWATER (Vice President)
- DARREN THAMES (Vice President)
- JEFF HARPER (Vice President)
- COLBY WRIGHT (Vice President)
- ERIC ACOSTA (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- MATTHEW LAY (President): $41,004 total reported compensation
- JOSH LAMB (Secretary): $33,552 total reported compensation
- CRAIG DEERINWATER (Vice President): $22,368 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Muscular dystrophy boot drive to raise funds for mda. Pink t shirts drive for project woman cancer drives. Fundraisers to purchase smoke detectors, union and public education and for other 501{c} 5 organizations.
What it reported doing in 2025
To provide awareness to the general public.on fire safety and raise money for charitable causes
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.3%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 59.7%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.1%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.3% of revenue deployed · 59.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $41K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 22 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX CompCurrentOfficersDirectors column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.