International Assistance Corp Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

3 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

To provide training to school teachers in india

Contribution to schools in india $3,571,058

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
Grant itemization coverage: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -5,800%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.6M in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.