Interfraternity Council of Arizona State University

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463707236
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Tempe, AZ, USA
Phone
4809655292
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,578
Expenses
$83,016
Assets
$46,122
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HAROLD ROGERS (PRESIDENT (11/23-4/24))
  • KEEGAN COMBS (PRESIDENT (11/24-4/25))

People named in this filing

  • HAROLD ROGERS (PRESIDENT (11/23-4/24))
  • KEEGAN COMBS (PRESIDENT (11/24-4/25))
  • AIDAN LAKE (VP FINANCE (11/23-4/24))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The interfraternity council is a self-governing body representing the member fraternities at Arizona state university.

What it reported doing in 2024

The ifc strives to promote excellence in all aspects of fraternity community from academics to philanthropic events. The ifc works to better the Arizona state university fraternity community and represent the member fraternities to the greater campus community. Ifc assists with fraternity recruitment each semester and serves as a clearing house for all issues related to the fraternity community. The interfraternity council at Arizona state university is a north-american interfraternity conference (nic) chartered ifc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.8%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 25.9%; rating input score 26

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.2%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -63.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 34.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.8% of revenue deployed · 25.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.