Interfaith Solidarity and Accompaniment Coalition Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832470471
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Fort Collins, CO, USA
Phone
9193237189
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Urban, Community Economic Development
Affiliation
Interfaith

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,549,049
Expenses
$923,563
Assets
$1,177,553
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Arpi Miller (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Arpi Miller (Executive Director): $140,000 total reported compensation
  • Jesus Castro (Vice Chair): $88,456 total reported compensation
  • Isabel Docampo (Chair): $58,968 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Together, as directly impacted community members and interfaith people of conscience, we draw on our embodied knowledge and wisdom traditions, to work in solidarity for human dignity, equity and immigration justice, co-creating transformative communities of welcome, connection, empowerment and belonging.

What it reported doing in 2025

Other program expenses include community empowerment workshops with resources targeting community health, small business support and skill-building, education opportunities and legal support; newcomer support in the form of winter gear and hygiene products for Middle and High School youth in the school district each fall; trainings and conflict mediation support for small landlords and tenants, education forums and trainings for faith communities and fellow organizations/agencies focused on reducing community barriers, creating mutual understanding and stimulating community economic development and thriving. ISAAC provides workshops and other programs to approximately 1500 community members/family units in collaboration with with 40+ organizations, institutions, local government agencies and supported by many individual volunteers from our faith communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $54.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.4%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 47.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $781K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $140K · 12 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.