InterFaith Leadership Council of Metropolitan Detroit
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271572126
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- West Bloomfield, MI, United States
- Phone
- (313) 338-9777
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Interfaith
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $187,468
- Expenses
- $217,574
- Assets
- $277,325
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAMAN SINGH (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STANCY ADAMS (DIRECTOR)
- ROBERT A BRUTTELL (VICE CHAIRMA)
- DANIEL BUTTRY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
InterFaith Leadership Council of Metropolitan Detroit brings people of many faiths together to build a harmonious community through understanding, respectful relationships, and resilience in the face of misunderstanding and bigotry. The InterFaith Leadership Council of Metropolitan Detroit brings people of diverse religious, racial and ethnic backgrounds together to work toward a harmonious community based on our highest and best values. Our volunteer board and committee members represent a wide range of backgrounds. Their diverse experiences and beliefs help us in our mission of achieving a community of justice, peace and belonging for everyone. Our programs are open to all in the region. We teach understanding which leads to deep, respectful relationships among individuals and congregations of different faiths as well as those who do not have a religious affiliation. We advocate...
What it reported doing in 2024
Interfaith education with the intent of obtaining for the metropolitan detroit community all the synergies and other creative benefits that knowledge and understanding can provide.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 43.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 80% of revenue deployed · 68% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $148K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.