Interfaith Coalition of Whatcom County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911202013
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Bellingham, WA, USA
Phone
3607343983
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Affiliation
Interfaith

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$456,888
Expenses
$525,536
Assets
$2,749,011
Liabilities
$21,743

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Susan Jancic (President)
  • Jen Callaghan (Treasurer / Executive Director)
  • Shawn Dooley (Secretary / Former Executive Director)
  • Mary D Connolly (Former Executive Director)
  • Eileen M Harrington (Former Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Mary D Connolly (Former Executive Director): $74,397 total reported compensation
  • Eileen M Harrington (Former Executive Director): $49,188 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To break the cycle of family homelessness and poverty in Whatcom County by providing emergency shelter and transitional housing services with case management and connection to other community resources. Interfaith Coalition carries out its mission in collaboration with over 40 communities of faith in Whatcom County.

What it reported doing in 2024

Addressing Local Poverty Issues - We connect volunteers with Whatcom county neighbors experiencing poverty, housing instability, and homelessness. Our volunteers provide food and basic hygiene items, warm hats and socks to people living on the edge. Project Warm-up crafters knit scarves and hats for low-income neighbor needs. These are distributed via CAST and the Fall Coat Drive. Coffee And Sandwiches Together (CAST) In 2024, our CAST program provided 25,855 sandwiches (plus coffee and fruit) for guests through our Coffee And Sandwiches Together (CAST) program. We distributed food four nights a week at our pickup location behind the Bellingham library. Operating the CAST program requires 10 volunteers each day to prepare and distribute the food. Volunteers work 2 hours per night. Fall Coat Drive We gave out 632 coats and jackets in partnership with The Bellingham Food Bank, the United Church of Christ of Ferndale, and the Deming Mission for an estimated value $11,764.Holiday Joy This program provided multiple presents to 121 families, comprising 308 children and youth, an increase of 54% over the previous year. Sponsorship came from 46 groups and individuals, with an estimated donation value of $34,679. Volunteers are the backbone of these programs. During the 2024 fiscal year, 287 volunteers provided 4,212 hours of service, with an estimated value at $40.71 per hour of $171,471. The volunteers came from over 20 Whatcom County faith communities.In partnership with the Whatcom County School District, Catholic Community Services, and the Alms Ministry, over 25 families received financial assistance through our Beacon of Hope program last year. One-time grants helped families to get into permanent housing, avoid eviction brought on by reduced work hours, or make car repairs. Additionally, the Interfaith Coalition provided administrative support for the participating Faith Communities and community partners. Interfaith Coalition staff time, truck rental, snacks, and event supplies are part of the Interfaith Coalition's operating budget.Lastly, in 2024/2025, Interfaith Coalition embarked on a Capacity Building endeavor, working with our faith communities to determine how best to mobilize our congregations to identify additional needs that need to be addressed within Whatcom County.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 69.9%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.23; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 69.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $367K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.