Interface Creative Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

4 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Provide cultural illumination.

To market the cultural and civic assets of springfield. To continue the redevelopment of springfield as a vital cultural hub.

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -6.3%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 24.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -58.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -108.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $234K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $227K · 4 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.