Intercultural Community Center in Dearborn

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922844443
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Dearborn, MI, USA
Phone
3132544229
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Coalitions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,000
Expenses
$78,124
Assets
$111,543
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Terri Pilarski (President, Director, Acting Executive Director)
  • Halim Shukair (Vice President, Director)
  • DeAmo Murphy (Former Executive Director, Former Director)

People named in this filing

  • Terri Pilarski (President, Director, Acting Executive Director)
  • Halim Shukair (Vice President, Director)
  • Karen Beck (Secretary, Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Intercultural Community Center in Dearborn (ICCD) is a community coalition (Community Improvement & Capacity Building NTEE S21) that gathers individuals and groups from diverse cultural backgrounds to cultivate strong relationships and share and learn from one another (Cultural & Ethnic Awareness NTEE A23), and work (Citizen Participation NTEE W24) and lead (Leadership Development NTEE W70) together in education and service projects for the wider Dearborn-Dearborn Heights community in Michigan.

What it reported doing in 2024

ICCD actively involves diverse groups and creates partnerships to identify projects, share leadership roles, and develop community action teams, activities or events. Action teams include (a) College Food Security (collaborating with the campus food pantries at University of Michigan Dearborn and Henry Ford Community College to actively respond to student food insecurity), (b) Environment (holding forums to build awareness of the lifelong health risks of contaminants and raising awareness throughout the community about environmental health), (c) Music (offering diverse musical experiences filled with fellowship and learning), and (d) Educational forums about peacemakers in Palestine-Israel. Sponsored events include an Earth Day Sustainability Swap in April bringing together people and organizations working on environmental justice projects, and the Juneteenth weekend long celebration in Dearborn. New action teams and events are formed as community partners identify community education and service needs and collaborate to identify funds, leaders, and volunteers to support new action teams, projects and events. These activities involved more than 40 community service organizations and more than 200 individuals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.1%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 81.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -61.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.1% of revenue deployed · 2.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.