Intercommunity Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 060954809
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- East Hartford, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8605695900
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,204,316
- Expenses
- $43,177,640
- Assets
- $30,447,650
- Liabilities
- $9,864,663
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY BEAUREGARD LCSW (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- TYLER BOOTH LCSW (VICE PRESIDENT AND COO)
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLY BEAUREGARD LCSW (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $376,846 total reported compensation
- TYLER BOOTH LCSW (VICE PRESIDENT AND COO): $354,955 total reported compensation
- DR RAYMOND MORRIS MD (PSYCHIATRIST): $354,096 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Intercommunity inspires hope and promotes whole-person health by providing high-quality, affordable, compassionate healthcare for everyone.
What it reported doing in 2024
Fqhc-la services: services include primary care to address physical health concerns, mental health care, or addiction recovery to anyone who comes to intercommunity's outpatient clinics located in east hartford, hartford and south windsor regardless of life situation, ability to pay, or age with ability to refer to specialty services and hospital services if needed. Approximately 78,000 services were provided to over 6,000 individuals for fiscal year 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 86.3%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $27.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 86.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $37.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $377K · 21 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.1M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.