InterCommunity Health Network CCO
Legal name: Intercommunity Health Plans Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931124326
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Corvallis, OR, United States
- Phone
- 541-768-7863
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $576,734,442
- Expenses
- $588,827,083
- Assets
- $167,981,152
- Liabilities
- $78,081,531
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUGLAS BOYSEN (BOARD CHAIR / CEO SHS)
- BRUCE BUTLER (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DOUGLAS BOYSEN (BOARD CHAIR / CEO SHS): $1,407,871 total reported compensation
- DANIEL SMITH (SVP / CFO): $688,921 total reported compensation
- BRUCE BUTLER (CEO): $554,044 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
IHN-CCO was formed in 2012 to unify health services and systems for Oregon Health Plan (Medicaid) members in Benton, Lincoln, and Linn Counties—improving community health while lowering/containing the cost of care through coordinated health initiatives and stakeholder engagement. You can call, text or chat 988 from anywhere in the nation to get compassionate care and support from trained crisis counselors. Learn More Samaritan Health Services, InterCommunity Health Network CCO & Samaritan Health Plans to Affiliate With MultiCare. Working Together to Prevent Suicide Across Our Communities An older sister hugs her younger little sister. Community Voices Drive Innovative Health Care Changes. The IHN-CCO Community Advisory Council (CAC) is made up of local community members and county government representatives. Hear from some of our representatives in this short video, then learn more...
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide medical coverage to Oregon health plan members as a project under the medicaid program serving approximately 82,134 enrollees with fully capitated healthcare using a community-based model. In cooperation with the state of Oregon, health services including medical, prescription medications and durable medical equipment are provided to qualified members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 62.5%; rating input score 62; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.1%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $577.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 35 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 61 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.