Intercollegiate Center For Classical Studies

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830406747
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Brentwood, TN, USA
Phone
9082565045
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Undergraduate College (4-year)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,060,670
Expenses
$2,791,559
Assets
$19,837,716
Liabilities
$1,935,288

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • Franco Sgariglia (Director Italian Program): $197,738 total reported compensation
  • Giuseppina Vallefuoco (Facility manager): $154,548 total reported compensation
  • Sonia Sabnis (Professor in Charge): $144,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The intercollegiate center for classical studies in rome provides undergraduate students with an immersive, academically rigorous study abroad program in classical studies, offering unparalleled access to the ancient world through site-based learning that integrates history, literature, language, archaeology, and art.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Intercollegiate Center for Classical Studies ("the Centro") is a premier academic program based in Rome, Italy, offering undergraduate students from North American colleges and universities a rigorous, place-based curriculum in ancient history, archaeology, Greek and Latin literature, cultural heritage management, the Italian language, and Renaissance and Baroque art. Founded in 1965 and incorporated as a nonprofit in 2004, the Centro celebrated 60 years of immersive classical education in 2025. To date, over 3,500 students have participated in this life-changing experience, many of whom describe their time at the Centro as foundational to their personal and intellectual development. Alumni have gone on to careers in education, public service, academia, the arts, and beyond-often crediting the Centro for instilling in them a deeper understanding of culture, critical thinking, and global awareness. What sets the Centro apart is its interdisciplinary and place-based approach: students learn directly within Rome's extraordinary historical landscape, engaging daily with iconic archaeological and artistic landmarks under the guidance of leading scholars from top U.S. institutions. The program combines academic rigor with experiential learning, making full use of Rome's status as a living classroom. Each semester, the Centro serves a new cohort of students, supported by tuition, student fees, contributions, and summer housing revenue. As the only program of its kind, the Centro continues to thrive as a model of excellence in the humanities and remains deeply committed to cultivating the next generation of global, historically-informed leaders.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 29%; rating input score 29
  • Program expense ratio: 69%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $27.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: Limited
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 65.4%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.11; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 29% of revenue deployed · 69% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $198K · 9 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $158K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.