Interaction Resources in Service

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204071403
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Humboldt, AZ, USA
Phone
9285336175
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,429
Expenses
$43,365
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES E JONES (President)
  • JOHN O'HAGAN (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JAMES E JONES (President)
  • JOHN O'HAGAN (Vice President)
  • ODIS BROCKMAN (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of interaction resources in service "iris" is charitable, religious, and educational in nature. Iris assists national church planters in various locations around the world as they plant new churches. Iris mentors the church planters and conducts educational conferences on location for these same individuals. Iris raises funds for short-term mission trips.

What it reported doing in 2020

International travel was prohibited during 2020, due to the coronavirus pandemic. However, consistent mentoring relationships were maintained, using the internet for conferences and personal interaction with many pastors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.9%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.7%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -152.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -63% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.9% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.