Inter-County Energy Cooperative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
610235235
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Danville, KY, USA
Phone
(859) 236-4561
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$75,053,878
Expenses
$75,053,878
Assets
$167,444,528
Liabilities
$100,429,596

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JERRY CARTER (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JERRY CARTER (PRESIDENT/CEO): $353,208 total reported compensation
  • DAVID PHELPS (VP OPERATIONS): $242,705 total reported compensation
  • ALYSSA KURTZ (VP FINANCE): $206,749 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Member-Owned. Community Powered. Together, we provide affordable, reliable energy that supports and strengthens the communities we serve. Inter-County Energy would like to give our member the opportunity to have our Member Handbook(link is external). It contains a lot of information about your cooperative that can be useful as long as you are a member of Inter-County Energy. Most of the information contained within this handbook can be found on our website or by calling our offices. Our Mission Our mission here at Inter-County Energy is to provide energy and services to our members through a **culture of Safety, Accountability, Integrity, Innovation, and Commitment to Community.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provide electric service to member owners on a patronage basis. Serve approximately 28,403 consumers per month.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.23; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $353K · 13 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.8M reported
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.