Intelliversity
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271186214
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Carson City, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7607078522
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Small Business Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,040
- Expenses
- $40,266
- Assets
- $6,124
- Liabilities
- $20,239
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert S Kramarz (President)
People named in this filing
- Robert S Kramarz (President)
- Ravi Bhola (Director)
- Jaye Riggio (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Intelliversity's mission is to support innovative entrepreneurs whose ideas can become products and services that impact the world in a positive way. Intelliversity's purpose is to provide worthy entrepreneurs involved in start-up companies in the high-technology, alternative energy, environmental sustainability and emerging health technology industries with educational tools, resources, training, and other assistance, free of charge through direct grants. The goal is to ensure that worthy entrepreneurs have the best chance possible to succeed and to go on to create jobs, economic wealth, and valuable products and services that impact technology, health, and the environment.
What it reported doing in 2014
Training and education provided to a number of scientists and their organizations in the San DIego area, development training material, and setting up online systems to enable this training.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 31
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.3%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 36.6%; rating input score 37
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.6%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.3; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 69.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 79.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28.3% of revenue deployed · 36.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2012 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.