Intelehealth Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
812934607
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4102313787
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,352,693
Expenses
$2,000,667
Assets
$1,700,189
Liabilities
$32,999

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Neha Verma-voting until 1224 (CEO)
  • Soumyadipta Acharya (President)
  • Margo Drakos - until 1024 (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Neha Verma-voting until 1224 (CEO): $101,205 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to improve health outcomes like reducing malnutrition, improving the management of diabetes, providing home care for patients and managing care for pregnant women. We go beyond just providing technology, but also provide end-to-end implementation support, training, monitoring and evaluation support to ensure projects meet their impact goals. We offer a COMPREHENSIVE TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED INTERVENTION THAT INCLUDES TELEMEDICINE, TASK-SHIFTING, TRAINING, DECISION SUPPORT, EDUCATION, RESEARCH, POLICY, INNOVATIVE FINANCING AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT. We have connected last mile communities with uninterrupted healthcare impacting a population size of 41M through 1.2M+ effective teleconsultations and 136,000+ health service consultations.

What it reported doing in 2024

ESanjeevani - Intelehealth worked with the Government of India on the eSanjeevani program in Jharkhand, Odisha, and Karnataka. By building leadership capacity, developing technology, and conducting research, the initiative improved access to care in rural and tribal areas. It strengthened 7% of Indias public health facilities, reached more than 2.5 million patients, and supported thousands of health workers and doctors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some related-organization disclosures are missing.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $22.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 40.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 31.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.