Integrated Healthcare Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943211035
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5102081740
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,883,523
- Expenses
- $21,249,554
- Assets
- $16,935,950
- Liabilities
- $10,073,638
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
63 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFFREY RIDEOUT (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFFREY RIDEOUT (PRESIDENT/CEO): $644,717 total reported compensation
- MICHELLE LEWIS (VP OF MARKETING AND BUSINESS): $386,403 total reported compensation
- DOLORES YANAGIHARA (VP STRATEGIC INITIATIVES): $377,226 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. As a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique role as a trusted facilitator to make the healthcare system work better for everyone. Our vision is a more integrated healthcare system that delivers high-quality, affordable, and equitable care.
What it reported doing in 2024
The align. Measure. Perform. (amp) program is one of the largest, most established value-based healthcare performance improvement programs in the country. Amp uses a common stakeholder-approved measure set and methodology to create clear performance benchmarks and reward high-performing providers. Initiated in 2001, the program now includes participation from 13 health plans and nearly 200 California physician organizations caring for over 13 million californians. Amp's four program components work together to encourage continuous improvement. 1) a common set of performance measures and benchmarks helps participants focus on the most important quality improvement efforts and use resources more efficiently. 2) health plans get a recommended value-based incentive payment design that they can adapt as needed to reward high-performing providers. 3) amp's program results are publicly reported each year, allowing consumers to compare provider performance within their area. And 4) each year, top-performing providers and those demonstrating the greatest year-to-year improvement are recognized.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.1%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 48 of 48 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $645K · 63 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $9.8M reported
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.