Integrated Faith Assembly Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261514957
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Cleveland, OH, USA
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$362,283
Expenses
$271,660
Assets
$126,950
Liabilities
$29,024

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JULIA ALLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JULIA ALLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Church

What it reported doing in 2013

WE ARE COMMITTED TO EQUIPPING CHRISTIANS THROUGH BIBLICAL PREACHING AND TEACHING OF GOD'S WORD. IFA IS DEDICATED TO STRENGTHENING FAMILIES, GROWING A SUBSTANTIAL REGIONAL ECONOMY BY HELPING PEOPLE IMPROVE THEIR LIVES IN WAYS THAT LEAD TO SOCIAL CHANGE. WE ARE COMMITTED TO CULTIVATING LEADERSHIP AND PROMOTING EMPOWERMENT OF AT-RISK YOUTH AND FAMILIES THROUGH TRAINING AND EDUCATION.There were many accomplishments in 2013. They include the fllowing:1. The Stewardship and Hope Award from St. Martin De Porres2. The Unsung Community Hero Award from Fox 8 News and the Word Church3. Chosen for the Pay It Forward Tour4. The Home Beautification Program took families from shelters to being together in nice homes5.The Youth Resiliency Academy6. Contributed in excess of $200,000 in goods to families in need

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.9%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 94.6%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 60.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.9% of revenue deployed · 94.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $257K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.