Integrated Community Solutions
Legal name: Integrated Community Solutions Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237346463
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Green Bay, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9204961919
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $33,959,724
- Expenses
- $33,866,057
- Assets
- $1,519,858
- Liabilities
- $1,250,277
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATT ROBERTS (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MEGAN WALKER (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MATT ROBERTS (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $99,457 total reported compensation
- LORI DEGRAVE (SECRETARY): $84,240 total reported compensation
- JOE KAHLER (TREASURER): $69,773 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Integrated Community Solutions (ICS) supports Wisconsin residents in their move towards self-sufficiency through housing assistance programs, helping low-to moderate-income individuals find appropriate housing and develop self-sufficiency. Mr. Dilling is committed to community service and is invested in helping community members gain a better quality of life through ICS programs and services. His public accounting experience provides the financial background needed to support ICS staff and leaders with daily operations as well as with the long term interest of the organization. Jake Dittmann _Vice President of Commercial Lending, Bank of Luxemburg_. Dittmann is an Army Veteran who was deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. His passion for looking out for others continues as he assists our Board in providing direction for ICS programs. His experience in the banking...
What it reported doing in 2024
As part of the brown county housing authority's housing choice voucher (hcv) program, integrated community solutions (ics) administered the family self-sufficiency program. This is a goal-based, employment-focused program that helps participants meet educational and professional goals, which encourages them to move toward self-sufficiency and the eventual goal of no longer needing publicly funded assistance. Throughout 2024, the program supported an average of 68 participants per month, with 4 graduating from the program for meeting their established goals. These graduates took with them a savings account that was held by ics during their participation and grew monthly as participants increased their earned income. The homeownership program - another program within the larger housing choice voucher program - supported an average of 39 participants each month who were able to purchase their own home and receive mortgage assistance from the program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 98.2%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.82; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 98% of revenue deployed · 98.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $33.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $99K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.