Integrated Community Facilities Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208970186
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Staten Island, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9175724865
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,004,150
- Expenses
- $902,260
- Assets
- $9,027,354
- Liabilities
- $6,698,309
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLES DeSTEFANO (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- EMMANUEL STRATAKIS (EXECUTIVE DIREC): $61,250 total reported compensation
- BERNARDO PACE (BOARD MEMBER): $11,667 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide recreational, social and cultural activities in a community facility for the residents of staten island and to provide facilities for programs for persons with developmental disabilities.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization operates buildings that are facilities for the community which provide for programs for persons with developmental disabilities. The daily operations of the buildings necessitate general repairs, insurance coverage, professional fees and depreciation expense. Mortgage Interest Expense related to the mortgages on the properties were also incurred and paid according to the terms of the respective mortgage documents. In addition, donations are periodically made to the facility to assist with its programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.1%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.01; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $752K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $61K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.