Integrate for Good Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833075186
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Collegeville, PA, USA
Phone
4848541375
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$469,100
Expenses
$468,282
Assets
$420,564
Liabilities
$194,087

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BEVERLY WEINBERG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DENEAN LEAR (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • BEVERLY WEINBERG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $144,025 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of integrate for good is to empower students and adults with disabilities to discover and share their ability and talent within local communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Empowerment lab: over 10 weeks, students explore their talents and work preferences, creating a dynamic digital portfolio that showcases their strengths through photos and videos. This strengths-based approach, with 1:1 family support, goes beyond a traditional resume to bring abilities to life. Executive functioning skills workshop: this interactive seminar helps young people with disabilities develop essential executive functioning skills for academic and work success. Participants will learn 12 core skills, including time management, emotional regulation, and adaptability, through interactive workshops in a supportive environment that fosters growth and confidence.healthy relationships: healthy relationships equips individuals with disabilities with essential skills for building and maintaining relationships. Through interactive lessons and activities, participants learn about friendships, romance, boundaries, hygiene, and communication, fostering social and life skills for success.mental health matters: mental health matters is a hands on program designed to bring people of all abilities together through interactive activities focused on self-care, compassion, and advocacy. Participants engage in hands-on exercises that teach the importance of mental health while fostering a sense of community and connection through service projects, intentional discussion, and shared experiences.further, there are leadership incubator courses, inclusive volunteering and opening doors on campus.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.8%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.04 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 38.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 36.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.8% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $361K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $144K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.