Instrument Contracting & Engineering As

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521481496
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Fort Mill, SC, USA
Phone
7049050319
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$28,506
Expenses
$29,710
Assets
$60,911
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS ENSMINGER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOEL GIVNER (BOARD MEMBER)
  • THOMAS ENSMINGER (PRESIDENT)
  • JACOB SNYDER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide support to the united association's scholarship funds efforts; through rigorous, education based trainings.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization advanced its mission to promote fair labor practices, strengthen labor-management relations, and support workforce development in the construction industry during 2025 with the following accomplishments:1. Continued to update and maintain the icea website (www.instrumentcontractors.com). 2. Developed a website-based man-hours reporting system to track total craft man-hours worked under the collective bargaining agreement, including adding an additional hyperlink to the icea website for all contractors to report monthly man-hours worked. 3. Recruited one (1) new contractor member to icea. 4. Adjudicate one (1) step 8 grievance. 5. Provided continued support to update the respective ibew and united association (ua) list of referral local unions to be used by contractors to help secure skilled i & c technicians. 6. Continued to provide input and support for the annual ibew construction & maintenance conference. Also provided support to the united association's scholarship fund efforts. 7. Held three (3) in-person labor/management meetings/conferences.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.2%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.05; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 52.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.