Institute on Natl Social Inequities & Gaps in Health & Health T

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871471624
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-PF 2023
Location
Detroit, MI, USA
Phone
3133552150
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,125
Expenses
$32,849
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHARLES WILLIAMS II (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MAURICE RUDDS (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • W AVIS ELAM (TREASURER): $150 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nbsp; insight nbsp; community-based nbsp; participatory nbsp; research nbsp; model nbsp; equitably nbsp; engages nbsp; community nbsp; members nbsp; community nbsp; leaders nbsp; clergy nbsp; and nbsp; researchers nbsp; creating nbsp; a nbsp; level nbsp; playing nbsp; field nbsp; and nbsp; maximizing nbsp; all nbsp; voices nbsp; of nbsp; partners nbsp; in nbsp; the nbsp; process nbsp; from nbsp; survey nbsp; development nbsp; qualitative nbsp; interview nbsp; question nbsp; crafting nbsp; to nbsp; publishing nbsp; articles nbsp; and nbsp; conference nbsp; presentations nbsp; the nbsp; researcher nbsp; associates nbsp; play nbsp; a nbsp; vital nbsp; role nbsp; in nbsp; solving nbsp; problems nbsp; evaluating nbsp; what nbsp; works nbsp; and nbsp; what nbsp; should nbsp; be nbsp; a nbsp; best nbsp; practice

What it reported doing in 2024

The insight community-based participatory research model equitably engages community members community leaders clergy and researchers creating a level playing field and maximizing all voices of partners in the process. From survey development qualitative interview question crafting to publishing articles and conference presentations. The researcher associates play a vital role in solving problems evaluating what works and what should be a best practice.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 26
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.5%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.2%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.5% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $150 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.