Ieee
Legal name: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131656633
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7329810060
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Vocational, Technical Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $714,064,929
- Expenses
- $600,137,430
- Assets
- $1,493,325,312
- Liabilities
- $316,944,311
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
45 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Deepak Mathur (Director & Vice President, Member & Geographic Activities)
- Kathleen A Kramer (IEEE President-Elect)
- Keith A Moore (Director & President IEEE-USA)
- Manfred J Schindler (Director & Vice President, Technical Activities)
- Rabab Kreidieh Ward (Director & Vice President, Educational Activities)
- Sergio Benedetto (Director & Vice President, Publication Services and Products)
Highest reported compensation
- SOPHIA A MUIRHEAD (Executive Director & Chief Operating Officer): $1,149,504 total reported compensation
- THOMAS R SIEGERT (ASSISTANT TREASURER & CFO): $645,710 total reported compensation
- PAUL CANNING (DIRECTOR INTERNATIONAL SALES): $597,508 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advancing Technology for Humanity.
What it reported doing in 2024
MEMBERSHIP AND PUBLIC IMPERATIVES: IEEE is a public charity with a global presence, but its impact begins at the local level driven by dedicated members and volunteers committed to improving lives and communities worldwide. IEEE serves as the home where like-minded and passionate individuals join together and help push technology to new frontiers. With 347 sections and more than 2,800 chapters worldwide, IEEE facilitates the active participation of thousands of members and volunteers, who help contribute to the IEEE mission. In 2024, IEEE had a total of 486,616 members, from more than 190 countries worldwide, including 187,717 student members and 434,375 society members from the 39 technical societies. In 2024 IEEE members and volunteers collaborated with leading organizations and continued delivering on technological advancements and solutions to address the world's most pressing challenges to shape a better future. EDUCATIONAL EFFORTS: IEEE continues to lead in the area of engineering and technology education, offering comprehensive resources across all stages of learning: pre-university, university, and continuing professional education. Through innovative STEM initiatives, pre-university outreach, and recognition programs for engineering professionals and faculty, IEEE fosters a culture of lifelong learning and inspire the next generation of engineers. A) The IEEE TryEngineering program empowers educators to foster the next generation of technology innovators through a robust library of over 130 lesson plans. The TryEningeering Summer Institute offered nine-day hands-on engineering experiences for 330 high school students at three U.S. college campuses: University of Pennsylvania, Rice University, and University of San Diego. B) IEEE-Eta Kappa Nu (HKN) encourages and recognizes excellence in education and contributions to society through leadership in the IEEE technical fields of interest worldwide, hosting 748 engineering workshops and contributing 104,000 volunteer hours to support universities and local communities in 2024. C) The 2024 IEEE International Science and Engineering Fair awarded three IEEE Presidents' Scholarships each worth $10,000 for their outstanding innovative and sustainable technological projects: autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle system for ocean rescue, a soil carbon tracking device, and a mobile app that help ALS patients type sentences with only their eyes. D) IEEEXtreme 18.0 Programming Competition, a global 24-hour programming challenge, attracted over 19,900 students competing to solve real-world programming problems. The competition continues to be popular with the next generation of technologist with more than 8,500 teams across 75 countries participating. TECH ETHICS: IEEE continues to be very active in the intersection between technology and ethics. The IEEE TechEthics website (https://techethics.ieee.org/) provides access to technology ethics resources and information from across IEEE including education modules, articles, session recordings and ethics frameworks. HUMANITARIAN EFFORTS WORLDWIDE: IEEE Humanitarian Technologies is IEEE's Tech for Social Impact Hub for all humanitarian-related activities across IEEE, supported by a global network of volunteers and technical professionals. A) IEEE Empower a Billion Lives Competition brought together 575 teams across 75 countries to develop technological and sustainable innovations aimed at improving the lives of people in underdeveloped communities that make less than $2.15 per day. B) The IEEE Access & Abilities Competition provided financial support to a student team in developing a technological device that helped more than 150 children with hearing aids and cochlear implants learn Tamil in India. C) The IEEE REACH expanded free online, educational resources for pre-university educators to Africa, raising students' awareness of and interest in STEM in underdeveloped countries. D) Through the IEEE SA Foundational Technologies Practice, 200
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.5%; rating input score 98; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.49; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 31 of 31 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $580M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 45 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $24.4M reported
- Consistency: 44 of 46 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 35 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 25 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.