Institute of Addiction Medicine Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205850271
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA
Phone
4843518031
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Medical Disciplines Research

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,125
Expenses
$15,720
Assets
$104,941
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joseph R Volpicelli (CEO/Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Joseph R Volpicelli (CEO/Executive Director)
  • Kristine R Volpicelli (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The conduct of treatment research, clinical training, and general education with respect to addictive disorders such as alcohol and opioid use disorders.

What it reported doing in 2025

We extended our advocacy and training in evidence-based addiction treatment with a clinical training program for behavioral health workers on the integration of psychosocial support with the use of medications to treat addictive disorders. Nurse practitioner students from LaSalle University spent time with our program to learn didactic and clinical skills to treat people with alcohol and opioid addiction. In addition, we established the Naltrexone Alliance as an arm of IAM to specifically focus on the use of naltrexone to treat alcohol addiction. We have established a website that includes articles and other media to help educate the general public, health care administrators, and clinicians on the use of naltrexone.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 54.3%; rating input score 54

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -156.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.68; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 54.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.