Institute of Accessibility Professionals
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831601090
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Greenwood Village, CO, USA
- Phone
- 8007757838
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $82,800
- Expenses
- $65,229
- Assets
- $38,266
- Liabilities
- $20,695
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WESLEY WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SCOTT SILK (DIRECTOR)
- WILLIAM SCARI (DIRECTOR)
- CHANDLER LEE (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the iap is to improve the overall accuracy of accessible media services, including captioning, audio description, subtitling, encoding and transcription. Most commonly used for television, these services are also seen in corporate, educational and government environments, and public event areas. The initial goal is to ensure caption providers across the nation are trained by facilities or programs that focus on all aspects of quality: accuracy vs. The spoken word, synchronicity, completeness and, where necessary, placement.captioners also must be trained to handle the technical aspects of captioning, including but not limited to hardware, software, ip and phone connectivity, peripherals such as headphones, microphones and steno machines, and web and encoder modem delivery mechanisms.a well-rounded educational program focused wholly on all aspects of captioning, not simply the creation of text, will result in better captions for the caption viewer, increased uptime for
What it reported doing in 2019
In 2019 institute of accessibility professionals accredited the vitac real-time captioners training program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.