Institute For Youth Success Co Education Northwest

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943388509
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5032759500
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Child Matching Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,970
Expenses
$62,278
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

26 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Allan Warman (Co-Chair)
  • Mike Wells (Director)
  • Ryan Irwin (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Institute for Youth Success has a mission to lead and innovate youth organizations to improve outcomes and reduce social costs.

What it reported doing in 2015

Advocacy & Volunteer Recruitment - Institute for Youth Success works to increase the success of youth-serving organizations in Oregon and in SW Washington by uncovering new resources to enable more children to succeed. Institute for Youth Success advocates to public and private parties to encourage increased financial, political and social resources for youth development programs and to educate the public on the benefits of youth mentoring. Institute for Youth Success built or participated in collaborative groups, associations and government initiatives to advocate for support to youth development programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 74.1%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -246.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -24.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -23.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 74.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $46K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 26 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.