Institute for Transportation and Development Policy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521399520
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2126298001
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Transportation Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,609,853
Expenses
$11,968,829
Assets
$12,595,868
Liabilities
$3,055,591

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HEATHER THOMPSON (CEO)
  • ELLEN LOU (PRESIDENT)
  • JANETTE SADIK-KHAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • HEATHER THOMPSON (CEO): $319,209 total reported compensation
  • KATHLEEN LETCHFORD (CHIEF STRAT. AND DEV OFFICER): $214,931 total reported compensation
  • ANDREW HAUPT (COO/CFO): $170,985 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The institute for transportation and development policy (itdp) works around the world to design and implement high-quality transport systems and policy solutions that make cities more livable, equitable, and sustainable. Itdp is a global nonprofit at the forefront of innovation, providing technical expertise to accelerate the growth of sustainable transport and urban development around the world.

What it reported doing in 2024

Public transport: in africa, itdp africa continues to provide technical assistance to the addis ababa transport bureau (aatb) regarding the design of the b6 brt corridor. Itdp has provided feedback on the station locations and designs to ensure appropriate spacing and station designs incorporating passing lanes. In october 2024, itdp, along with consortium partners logit, delin, and transconsult, commenced a project to undertake data collection, analysis, and detailed design for the kumasi, ghana brt system, with the support of the world bank. The team has so far submitted the project inception report and survey methodology report to the department of urban roads. Under USAID's program for local and urban sustainability (plus), itdp is undertaking a study to develop a gender-responsive public transport industry transition for the dar rapid transit (dart) brt system phase 3. The project aims to improve service quality and security. It also aims to enhance operator business practices and establish incentives to support hiring, training, and retaining women at all levels of bus operations. Itdp has commenced project activities, starting with stakeholder coordination meetings with dart and the land transport regulatory authority (latra), as well as primary data collection on existing operations. Itdp africa also commenced a project to develop an e-bus financing framework for ethiopia with support from the children's investment fund foundation (ciff). Itdp issued a letter of introduction to the minister of transport and logistics (motl), who responded positively to working with itdp on the project. The project aims to establish a national framework for the electrification and formalization of public transport services in addis ababa and three secondary cities (possibly bahir dar, dire dawa, and hawassa). To date, the team has conducted the inception meeting with motl and the aatb. The following steps will include conducting primary data collection and key informant interviews to inform people about the design of the framework.the world bank appointed itdp africa to review the detailed design of the brt corridor in abidjan, cote d'ivoire. The yopougon-bingerville brt corridor is integrated with a grade-separated highway, which has posed several challenges in terms of accessibility and safety. Itdp reviewed the designs and provided solutions to improve access to stations, intersection design, and service integration with other mass rapid transit corridors, including the metro line and other brt corridors.in china, the modernization of the jinan trolleybus project has been completed, resulting in a restructured public transportation network, the introduction of a tiered bus system, streamlined bus routes, and enhanced integration with the metro system. Financed by the asian development bank (adb), the project includes six trolleybus lines, 80 km of on-road brt corridors, the procurement of 661 bus vehicles (210 trolleybuses, 451 electric buses), the construction of 16 bus yard stations, and 75.1 km of power supply facilities. According to the jinan bus company, the project is expected to save 41,200 tons of ghg emissions and 17.9 tons of pm2.5 emissions per year. Itdp has been a key partner throughout this work, providing technical and strategic support since 2017, including brt corridor selection, multi-modal integration, lez design, and bus line operation. At nearly usd $157 million, tianjin completed one of the most significant urban street improvement projects of its kind in china, with financial support from the world bank. The project resulted in over 260,000 more daily trips by walking and cycling, and 175,750 more trips by metro. The project supported upgrades and improvements to 189 roads in the city's urban core, totaling 132 kilometers. Upgrades included reconfiguring existing street layouts, repaving streets, and installing barriers to separate nmt from vehicles. In addition, the city is updating pedestrian crossing facili

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 54
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.9%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $115.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.9% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $10.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $319K · 16 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $110K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.