Institute for Sustainable Diversity & Inclusion

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810768260
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Kenmore, WA, USA
Phone
2063620336
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$114,556
Expenses
$158,011
Assets
$48,154
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Effenus Henderson Henderworks Inc (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Barbara Deane The GilDeane Group (Secretary/Treasurer): $30,000 total reported compensation
  • Effenus Henderson Henderworks Inc (President): $20,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Institute for Sustaniable Diversity and Inclusion (ISDI) is a non-profit organization whose mission is to strengthen individual and organizational capability for creating diverse, equitable and inclusive workplaces.

What it reported doing in 2024

Northwest Diversity Learning Series (NWDLS)In its 26th year, the 2024 NWDLS provided substantial, insightful, and cost-effective DEI education to managers and employees from for-profit companies, government agencies, non-profit organizations, educational institutions, and small businesses. Key features included:* A unique employer collaboration across the Pacific Northwest, Florida, and other states, repositioning DEI around intrinsic value.* Empowering employees, managers, and leaders to practice daily inclusion.* A readily accessible, well-planned virtual program-saving employers time/resources while enabling global participation.* Six bi-monthly workshops offering cutting-edge, engaging DEI learning.* Presentations by sought-after thought leaders delivering impactful, results-driven content.* Networking opportunities and best-practice sharing for addressing DEI challenges.Attendance & ResourcesIn 2024, about 475 people attended the six NWDLS morning workshops remotely (avg. (70/session), while more than 600 registered (avg. 99/session); all registered attendees received access to the webinar recordings if unable to attend the live workshops. Participants received tailored learning workbooks, and ISDI posted extensive online resources post-session to encourage continued learning.2024 Workshop Series: "THE DEI Factor: Unlocking Value in Optimum Organizational Performance"Six compelling 2.5-hour bi-monthly workshops featured world-class presenters:1. Jan. 25: The DEI Factor in Innovation: Leveraging the Creativity of Diverse TeamsPresenter: Rebekah Steele, co-author of INdivisible and Design the Future.Description: Explored how DEI catalyzes innovation by unlocking team creativity through diverse perspectives and inclusive environments, driving forward-thinking solutions.2. March 20: The DEI Factor in Psychological Safety: Creating a Safe Environment for EveryonePresenter: Damon Stoddard, Psychological Safety Coach & Founder of Change YOUniversity.Description: Examined the link between DEI and psychological safety, showing how inclusive cultures boost engagement, collaboration, transparency, retention, and well-being.3. May 16: The DEI Factor in Talent Retention: Building a Culture Where People Want to StayPresenter: Karen Brown, Founding & Managing Director, Bridge Arrow.Description: Focused on DEI practices (like mentoring) that managers and employees can adopt to foster belonging and retention.4. June 27: The DEI Factor in Engagement: Inspiring Growth Mindsets in the Multigenerational WorkforcePresenter: Anna Liotta, Founder of The Generational Institute and author of Unlocking Generational CODES.Description: Addressed engaging a five-generation workforce through DEI strategies that enhance personal growth, productivity, and inclusion.5. Sept. 26: The DEI Factor in Customer Satisfaction: Understand, Empathize and Relate to Every CustomerPresenter: Ana Carolina Trevio, DEI professional with expertise in the Hispanic market.Description: Explored using a DEI lens and growth mindset to understand diverse customer needs, build authentic relationships, and drive satisfaction.6. Nov. 14: The DEI Factor in Talent Pools: Expanding Options for Nontraditional CandidatesPresenter: Byron Slosar, Founder & CEO of hellohive.Description: Highlighted DEI practices to uncover talent from overlooked groups (e.g., neurodivergent, rural, disabled individuals), addressing biases and expanding talent pipelines.Engagement and NetworkingThe NWDLS connected participants from 16 Sponsor/Subscriber companies and organizations from the Seattle Area and Florida, plus individual attendees from 16 additional organizations in Washington State for a total of 32 participating organizations. Virtual sessions expanded geographic reach, facilitating vital DEI practice-sharing and networking.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 48
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 62.4%; rating input score 62
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -37.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.6%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -59.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 62.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $99K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $30K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.