Institute for Safe Medication Practices
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232757559
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Doylestown, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6108256000
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,402,337
- Expenses
- $3,870,900
- Assets
- $1,821,038
- Liabilities
- $3,263,288
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RITA JEW (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARCUS SCHABACKER MD PHD (DIRECTOR - CHAIR): $1,142,585 total reported compensation
- DHEERENDRA KOMMALA (DIRECTOR): $543,795 total reported compensation
- PETER CATALANO (DIRECTOR - TREASURER): $497,486 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to advance patient safety worldwide by empowering the healthcare community to prevent medication errors.the organization accomplishes its mission through its interdisciplinary efforts to:- collect and analyze reports of medication-related hazardous conditions, near-misses, errors, and other adverse drug events- disseminate timely medication safety information, risk-reduction tools, and error-prevention strategies- educate the healthcare community and consumers about safe medication practices- collaborate with other patient safety organizations, educational institutions, governmental agencies and other healthcare stakeholders- advocate the adoption of safe medication standards by accrediting bodies, manufacturers, policy makers, regulatory agencies, and standards-setting organizations- conduct research to provide evidence-based safe medication practices
What it reported doing in 2024
Technical assistance programs and education: education: ismp considers education to be a core component of its mission and offers a variety of valuable educational resources for healthcare practitioners and consumers, including frequent webinars, continuing education sessions at some of the nation's largest professional meetings, workshops, lectures, videos, and patient brochures. A wide range of free tools for healthcare practitioners, such as lists of high-alert drugs and potentially dangerous abbreviations, are available on www.ismp.org. In addition, ismp hosts medication safety fellowships.consults: each year, ismp provides confidential consulting services to healthcare facilities across the country in a wide range of practice settings (e.g., hospitals/health-systems, community and specialty pharmacies, ambulatory clinics, infusion centers, etc.) to help improve medication safety. Onsite proactive risk assessments in these practice settings by a multidisciplinary team of practitioners result in safe practice recommendations and a customized roadmap to medication error prevention. Ongoing guidance in implementation and follow-up support services are also provided as needed. Unlike other consultants, ismp constantly updates its evidence-based prevention strategies with real-time information gained from ongoing analysis of thousands of reports submitted to its national voluntary error reporting programs.error reporting and analysis: the voluntary ismp national medication errors reporting program (ismp merp) was started in order to learn about errors happening across the nation, understand root causes, and share "lessons learned" with the healthcare community. The program was expanded to include a national vaccine errors reporting program (ismp verp) and the first consumer error reporting program through ismp's consumer website (www.consumermedsafety.org). Each year, the programs receive a few thousand reports from healthcare practitioners and consumers. That information is used to bring about large-scale changes in medication safety through published guidelines, recommendations and best practices. In addition, based on the information submitted to the programs, national alert network (nan) alerts are issued as needed to warn providers of risk for errors that have caused or may cause serious harm or death. Research and best practices development: in addition to disseminating information on safe medication use gained through its reporting programs and other sources, ismp conducts original research to help provide evidence-based solutions and develops guidance and prevention strategies to prevent errors. Ismp has conducted national medication safety self-assessments for acute care hospitals in 2000, 2004, and 2011, a self-assessment for high-alert medications in 2018 and a self-assessment for perioperative medication safety in 2021. Topics that other ismp self-assessments have addressed include oncology, community/ambulatory pharmacy, and antithrombotic therapy. Ismp also develop best practices and most recently issued the 2024-2025 targeted medication safety best practices for hospitals and 2023-2024 targeted medication safety best practices for community pharmacy to identify, inspire, and mobilize national action on recurring safety problems.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 47
- Sustainability: 6
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.3%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 46.7%; rating input score 47
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -61.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.79; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 45.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.3% of revenue deployed · 46.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.