Institute for Responsible Citizenship
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 542034070
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2026602501
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,525,101
- Expenses
- $1,857,907
- Assets
- $3,758,509
- Liabilities
- $168,418
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM A KEYES IV (CHAIRMAN): $603,988 total reported compensation
- WILLIAM A KEYES V (VICE CHAIRMA): $162,200 total reported compensation
- ANDREW MULINGE (PROGRAM DIRE): $126,469 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The institute impacts communities, our country, and the world by preparing some of the nation's most talented college students to use their extraordinary gifts for service in a variety of fields. Institute alumni are currently serving as teachers and professors, pastors and counselors, lawyers and judges, doctors, entrepreneurs and business leaders, elected officials, and other impactful careers.
What it reported doing in 2024
The institute's flagship program is based on five core beliefs: 1) men with the greatest potential should be challenged to pursue the highest achievement. 2) men who work hard to live virtuous lives and achieve academic success should be recognized and rewarded. 3) men who are destined for leadership should understand fundamental economic, constitutional, and ethical principles. 4) men who strive to make a difference can have a greater impact by working together. 5) men of character should be encouraged to pursue success as a platform for service to their communities, our nation, and the world. Each year, we select 12 of the nation's best and brightest african american male college students for an intensive two-summer program that includes high-level internships in their fields of interest, rigorous academic seminars, professional development workshops, private meetings with public and private sector leaders, a variety of social activities, visits to important institutions in Washington and elsewhere, and illuminating conversations around the dinner table. To date, more than 250 young men have participated in the Washington program. Five of them have been named rhodes scholars, and an impressive number have received other prestigious academic awards. Alumni are working in impactful careers that benefit others. And they are committed husbands, loving fathers, and responsible citizens. During a session with the scholars, we estimated that more than 9 billion people will benefit from the careers of the 24 young men who were participating in the institute's Washington program in 2023. The institute pays all of the expenses of participation. We arrange internships, provide housing in a university residence hall, supply meals, and pay a generous stipend. Upon the completion of two summers, the institute donates 20,000 for each student in investment accounts managed by ariel investments, the nation's oldest african american-owned investment firm. The goal is to give the scholars a head start on building wealth, so they sign an agreement not to access the funds for ten years. Because of tremendous demand, the institute has established collegiate institutes in atlanta, charlotte, durham, greensboro, and New York. These programs operate during the academic year and serve students attending colleges and universities in those cities. These programs operate on saturdays and offer private meetings with some of the most prominent public and private sector leaders in those cities, personal and professional development workshops, and stipends.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 61
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.6%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 72.8%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.4%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 48%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.6% of revenue deployed · 72.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $604K · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.