Institute for Psychoanalytic Education
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274600814
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6467544870
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Higher Education Institutions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $481,629
- Expenses
- $498,422
- Assets
- $773,303
- Liabilities
- $111,210
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LISA BIALKIN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LISA BIALKIN (PRESIDENT)
- BENJAMIN CHENEY (TREASURER)
- MONICA MICHELL MD (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the institute for psychoanalytic education (d/b/a the psychoanalytic assiciation of New York, "pany") is to promote mental health through advanced clinical training, treatment, and scholarship.
What it reported doing in 2024
Pany's educational events and training are held in the heart of murray hill, at one park avenue (at 33rd street), 8th floor, nyu langone health, department of psychiatry. Depending upon the program, classes or events take place on saturdays; and monday or tuesday evenings. Our full list of programs includes: psychoanalytic trainingpsychoanalytic education is an intensive program which integrates three essential components: seminars in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis, which require four years to complete; supervised psychoanalytic treatment of patients; and a personal psychoanalysis. Pany offers training in adult psychoanalysis and child & adolescent psychoanalysis. Pany is a member of the american psychoanalyticwe had 20 adult psychoanalytic candidates this past year of the program.licensed psychoanalystnot all potential applicants meet the New York state education department (nysed) criteria to practice psychoanalysis. The institute at pany is designated by nysed as a licensure qualifying program for those whose degrees or licenses do not permit psychoanalytic practice.candidates in the lp program train in pany's adult psychoanalysis program and graduation from the adult psychoanalytic program fulfills the psychoanalytic education requirements for these candidates to sit for the licensed psychoanalyst (lp) exam. Lp candidates invited to train at pany meet the admissions criteria applied to all candidates, including the breadth of clinical experience required by the american association of psychoanalytic education (aape). We had 1 of the 20 adult psychoanalytic training program candidates as a lp candidate.academic associatewe offer education for professionals for whom a general understanding of psychoanalytic thought is useful in their primary field of work. This fosters a stimulating interchange of ideas between clinical psychoanalysts and scholars and professionals from other disciplines. Non-clinical education in psychoanalysis should be relevant to the applicant's own professional activities. Non-clinical candidates participate in the same classes and other educational experiences as clinical candidates, with the exception of psychoanalytic case work. Personal analysis for non-clinical candidates is highly recommended. We did not have any academic associates in this training year.intensive psychoanalytic psychotherapy year: bridge to psychoanalytic traininggraduates of panyfs psychodynamic psychotherapy and fellowship programs, or comparable programs at other institutes, mental health clinicians with at least two years of psychodynamic therapy experience, and candidates admitted to the psychoanalytic training program who need an additional preparatory year. Intensive psychoanalytic psychotherapy year - bridge to psychoanalytic training - is a one-year 25 week course for licensed mental health professionals encompassing didactic material and clinical case discussions. The aim is to develop the understanding and clinical skills needed to practice intensive psychotherapy, further knowledge of psychoanalytic theory and technique, and offer a bridge to psychoanalytic training. We had 5 bridge candidates for this first year of the program.psychodynamic psychotherapy trainingpany offers advanced training in psychodynamic psychotherapy. This two-year program enhances the knowledge and skills of clinicians through their own personal treatment, clinical and theoretical seminars, and weekly individualized case supervision. The program is staffed by panyfs psychoanalytic faculty. Successful completion of the program leads to a certificate in psychodynamic psychotherapy training. Continuing education credit is available. This past year we had 22 pty candidates in the two years.fellowship in psychoanalysisthe institute offers a one-year fellowship to introduce clinically-immersed professionals to psychoanalytic work and to pany, and to supplement their education with a clinically relevant psychoanalytic viewpoint. Classes are
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.7%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 36.8%; rating input score 37
- Fundraising efficiency: $36.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.55; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.7% of revenue deployed · 36.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $183K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.