Institute for Medication Access and Compliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 020564689
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Flemington, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9082681976
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,048
- Expenses
- $9,565
- Assets
- $35,842
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TERRY SHLIMBAUM MD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARK D PETERS II (TREASURER)
- TERRY SHLIMBAUM MD (PRESIDENT)
- CATHERINE WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary exempt purpose is to utilize collaberative relationships to provide underserved individuals access to medication and relevant information necessary to enhance their quality of life and to take advantage of the expertise of healthcare providers and supportive service organizations in order to advance medication access and compliance competency of society through innovative programs, education, and outcomes research.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization provides professional services, education, and supplies to disadvantaged individuals in its geographic region who would not otherwise have access to these items or whom access to these items would have resulted in significant financial hardship.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 71.4%; rating input score 71
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 52.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.75; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34% of revenue deployed · 71.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.