Institute for Healthcare Advancement
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330483197
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Anaheim, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5626904001
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,339,562
- Expenses
- $5,468,053
- Assets
- $22,224,914
- Liabilities
- $812,259
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL VILLAIRE MSLM (CHAIRMAN/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL VILLAIRE MSLM (CHAIRMAN/CEO): $630,896 total reported compensation
- NICHOLAS COLLATOS (COO): $327,271 total reported compensation
- MARIAN RYAN PHD MA MPH (CHIEF POLICY & RESEARCH): $294,119 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Iha's mission is "empowering people to better health" through social services, education and healthcare information delivery services, and learning and networking opportunities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Health literacy programs - a fee-based consulting service is available to organizations wishing to make their health information more accessible, understandable, and usable to their audience. Rewriting services, trainings, health literacy systems integration, and program implementation are offered. The institute launched "health literacy research and practice" in 2017, an open access, peer-reviewed online journal, to serve health literacy professionals.iha developed a portal for health literacy professionals, the health literacy solutions center. This portal provides health literacy professionals a way to network with one another, advance their professional development, find, and share resources, and participate in educational activities. Membership on the site is free. The site also hosts a discussion list, with a base of more than 16,000 health literacy professionals. In addition, iha launched itsassessment-based health literacy specialist certificate for health literacy professionals in november 2021.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 80.5%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -133.7%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.06; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $631K · 12 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $718K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.