Institute for Energy Medicine
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208673016
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Coalville, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8012010495
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,388
- Expenses
- $3,745
- Assets
- $97,424
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To research, document, and disseminate information about nonconventional healing practices which provide alternative resources for individuals seeking expanded options for health and well-being of patients and their loved ones during end-of-life care.
What it reported doing in 2012
"dying consciously, the greatest journey" is a free service dedicated to helping people die with dignity and peace. Program uses the death rites practiced by the shamanic traditions to increase understanding and facilitate the psychological and emotional closure needed at death. The organization produces and distributes an educational dvd, newsletter, brochure, and three websites - www.dyingconsciously.org, www.munayki.org and www.iem.org.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 29
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7.1%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 65.3%; rating input score 65
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 89.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 26.01; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -165.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 114.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 37.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 7.1% of revenue deployed · 65.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.