Institute for Educational Leadership
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521198450
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2028228405
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,579,512
- Expenses
- $8,367,948
- Assets
- $6,149,134
- Liabilities
- $2,125,215
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVEN KWESI ROLLINS (PRESIDENT IN)
- EDDIE KOEN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- EDDIE KOEN (PRESIDENT): $359,382 total reported compensation
- STEVEN KWESI ROLLINS (PRESIDENT IN): $278,919 total reported compensation
- MAAME APPIAH (CHIEF ADMIN): $253,327 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The institute for educational leadership, inc., known as iel, was incorporated on december 4, 1980, in the district of columbia, and serves to lift up underserved leaders and equip them with the knowledge, skills, and abilities to transform their communities through education with collaborative, equity-driven solutions. By cultivating strong capacity across all levels, we help local leaders drive meaningful change for communities, families, and children. Our vision is to have an equitable society in which shared leadership effectively uses all available resources for the betterment of their communities. Our mission is to develop and connect adults and youth leaders who strengthen communities and education systems in pursuit of equity.
What it reported doing in 2024
Center for family, school and community for more than 25 years, iel has assisted schools, communities, and other key stakeholders in building intentional partnerships that achieve better results for every young person, from early childhood to adulthood. Major initiatives of the center for family, school and community include: the coalition for community schools, in operation since 1997, is a national alliance that brings together school and community leaders to advocate for schools as centers of their communities, with purposeful results-focused partnerships at their heart. With the support of a steering committee representing education, youth development, higher education, child and family services, and local government, iel has helped to make community schools 'central to reform' according to former u.s. Secretary of education, arne duncan. More than 150 communities now have major community school's efforts and are part of a learning community of local initiatives. Through the coalition, iel is leading efforts to have federal and state policy be more responsive to the community school strategy. Place-based services for local leaders - in fy25, iel's place-based work, led by four regional directors, drove measurable impact advancing community school strategies in local communities. Operating across 34 states and u.s. Territories, the majority of services supported statewide initiatives that strengthened the capacity of education and community leaders to design and scale sustainable coalitions for community schools. Among the customized supports provided, 28% of services focused on coaching (building leadership skills and problem- solving capacity), while 27% focused on networking (connecting leaders across regions to share strategies and accelerate progress). Through this work, iel fostered alignment from the school level to regional collaboration in the northeast, southern, midwest, and western regions. Expanding state coalitions - iel has continued to grow state coalitions for community schools, providing a platform for local and state stakeholders to connect, deepen their skills, and advocate for supportive policies. The four stages of the state coalition are exploring, emerging, evolving, and expanding. In fy25, the state coalition was explored in 9 states, emerged in 14 states, evolved in 11 states, and expanded in 7 states. District leaders network on family and community engagement (fce) - the district leaders network on family and community engagement (dln) is a group of 225 individuals in district-level leadership positions primarily responsible for the oversight of our district's family and community engagement (fce) initiatives. Dln is a peer-driven knowledge network designed to engage members as both experts and learners through a national structure to support member capacity building activities. The network is unique in purpose, function and design and is grounded in the belief that through dln, members can increase their collective capacity to implement a systemic approach to family and community engagement, resulting in more consistent practice across districts, greater sustainability, and measurable impact on student outcomes and school improvement. Membership is granted exclusively to those who are tasked with oversight of their district's engagement efforts. Community schools x family engagement conference - csxfe - iel has hosted annual national conferences for over 20 years, which have continued to grow in attendance. Most recently, the coalition for community schools and family and community engagement has created a joint conference, with minneapolis, mn, being the home of the event in june 2025, with more than 3,500 attendees. Csxfe is designed to catalyze collaboration and action through community school & family engagement professionals and advocates with a renewed commitment. People from across the globe who believe all children deserve a safe place to live and opportunities to learn and thrive will c
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.7%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 75.1%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.7% of revenue deployed · 75.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $359K · 21 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $472K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 24 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.